Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Aug 14, 2025 12:40 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: New classical 3/4 builds
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2015 12:32 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:03 pm
Posts: 165
First name: Glenn
Last Name: Aycock
City: El Lago
State: Texas
Zip/Postal Code: 77586
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I started a pair of 3/4 size classicals awhile ago and recently got back to them.

They're based on the Bogdanovich plan.

I decided to keep the 650mm scale to ensure adequate tension, but I'll likely narrow the nut and bridge so the neck doesn't look so out of place on the tiny body.

The backs and sides are a variety of mahogany that was given me and the tops are redwood. Probably going to trim with walnut or cocobolo.

Image

Image




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



These users thanked the author Glenn_Aycock for the post: edstrummer (Sun May 17, 2015 6:09 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2015 1:31 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:42 am
Posts: 1135
Location: Hudson, MA
First name: Kevin
Last Name: Quine
City: Hudson
State: MA
Country: Usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Looking good so far. That mahogany is nice stuff....nothing better than gift wood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2015 1:47 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:12 pm
Posts: 3308
First name: Bryan
Last Name: Bear
City: St. Louis
State: Mo
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Looks nice, I look forward to updates. . .

_________________
Bryan Bear PMoMC

Take care of your feet, and your feet will take care of you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 9:19 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:03 pm
Posts: 165
First name: Glenn
Last Name: Aycock
City: El Lago
State: Texas
Zip/Postal Code: 77586
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm debating mahogany or walnut sides. The grain on this variety of "mahogany" really raised during bending - almost like splinters. Maybe why it was gifted...

I'm not looking forward to sanding that out, but I'll give it a shot.

Which brings me to the necks... I was planning to use genuine mahogany or Spanish cedar with the lighter "mahogany" backs and sides.

If I go with walnut sides, then maybe walnut necks too?

Thoughts?

Thanks for your valued and esteemed opinions :-)

Glenn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:21 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Nothing wrong with any of the woods you mentioned. Walnut is a little more chippy than Mahogany, and/or Spanish Cedar, but works fine for necks.

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 11:23 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:03 pm
Posts: 165
First name: Glenn
Last Name: Aycock
City: El Lago
State: Texas
Zip/Postal Code: 77586
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Chippy? I've worked with walnut for years and wouldn't describe it thus. It cuts like butter.

You mean bending characteristics?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2015 8:29 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:05 am
Posts: 9191
Location: United States
First name: Waddy
Last Name: Thomson
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I found it to be that way when carving the neck and heel with chisels and spokeshaves. Maybe it's a technique problem! Operator Head Space!

_________________
Waddy

Photobucket Build Album Library

Sound Clips of most of my guitars



These users thanked the author WaddyThomson for the post: Glenn_Aycock (Mon May 18, 2015 6:57 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2015 9:12 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:44 pm
Posts: 123
First name: Wayne
Last Name: Brown
City: Huntersville
State: NC
Zip/Postal Code: 28078
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Walnut makes a great neck material! It is a little more difficult to carve than mahogany. It's a bit heavier though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2015 11:22 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada
First name: Douglas
Last Name: Ingram
City: Lorette
State: Manitoba
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
When you say 3/4 size, what are you meaning? When referred to as 3/4 size, it usually means that everything is scaled down to accommodate small players such as children. If you're just making the body smaller, then its just a small bodied guitar. There are plenty of examples of those for inspiration. 630-640mm scale is often found on these. Also, working on a smaller body, pay attention to how stiff/flexible you make the top, the smaller body doesn't have the span that a larger body has and can be made with more spring than a large top.

Walnut will make a great guitar body. I have used it for necks and I like it for that, as well. But Spanish Cedar is the wood of choice for classicals, and its lighter weight may make it the better choice for balance on a smaller instrument.

Good luck!

_________________
Expectation is the source of all misery; comparison the thief of joy.
http://redrivercanoe.ca/



These users thanked the author douglas ingram for the post: Glenn_Aycock (Sat May 16, 2015 7:07 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: New classical 3/4 builds
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2015 7:07 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:03 pm
Posts: 165
First name: Glenn
Last Name: Aycock
City: El Lago
State: Texas
Zip/Postal Code: 77586
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I originally intended them to be actual 3/4 scale, but I was concerned about volume issues for such a small body and a short neck.

I thought maybe a full scale would ensure enough string tension to project well, but since one top is already braced and patched, it's options are more limited without moving the bridge patch.

The 650mm scale would join this body around the 18th fret, so now I'm looking at uke scales (I use the stewmac fret jig). Or maybe I can use one I have and start at a higher fret.

On the bright side, I pore filled the backs with pumice and shellac and am very impressed with the result. I did (both) in an hour what I was unable to do by brushing on several thick coats of shellac and level sanding. I'll post some picks after I get some bodying sessions done.

I don't want to complete the finish before I assemble the instruments...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2015 6:59 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:44 pm
Posts: 123
First name: Wayne
Last Name: Brown
City: Huntersville
State: NC
Zip/Postal Code: 28078
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Glenn, you could possibly make these into Terz guitars which are about 3/4 size with a shorter scale and are tuned a third higher. (Just a thought!)



These users thanked the author Wayne Brown for the post: Glenn_Aycock (Mon May 18, 2015 5:16 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2015 7:26 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:31 am
Posts: 936
Location: Ottawa, Canada
I'm glad to see you are considering shorter scales. Frankly, I don't see the point in making a smaller bodied guitar but with a full size guitar scale. It kind of misses the main point in my opinion.

Pat

_________________
There are three kinds of people:

Those that make things happen,
those that watch things happen,
and those that wondered what happened.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 5:21 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:03 pm
Posts: 165
First name: Glenn
Last Name: Aycock
City: El Lago
State: Texas
Zip/Postal Code: 77586
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Pat Hawley wrote:
I'm glad to see you are considering shorter scales. Frankly, I don't see the point in making a smaller bodied guitar but with a full size guitar scale. It kind of misses the main point in my opinion.

Pat


I intended them for children, but the full scale could also be for travel or parlor guitar, etc.

Guitars haven't always been D-sized :-)

Glenn


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2015 11:35 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:03 pm
Posts: 165
First name: Glenn
Last Name: Aycock
City: El Lago
State: Texas
Zip/Postal Code: 77586
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I pared the braces down a bit further (triangular profile) on the braced top and bungled it pretty well.

No matter how much tape I laid or how I held the chisel, I managed to dig into the top. The damage was not irreparable but definitely not my best effort.

I was using a different (thicker) chisel than I normally use. I definitely needed to round the corners.

Then I got to thinking about a making a tool to safely profile fan braces by pulling rather than pushing, like a tiny, triangular scorp, except with the cutting edges on the sides rather than the scoop.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: NikolayUsalf, Treenewt and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com